| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

2009春 空間的文化與社會分析

Page history last edited by 林佩穎 14 years, 9 months ago

科目名稱:空間的文化與社會分析          必修   R選修      教師: 黃孫權               

任課班級:跨領域藝術研究所 碩二

每學期開課學分數:上學期  學分     下學期 3   學分

總學分數:  3   學分   每週上課時數:     小時

連繫電話:               辦公地點:             辦公時間(Office hour):


 

一、教學目標:

本課程為基地分析(site analysis)課程的後續。目的在於介紹當代連結社會與文化、空間三個範疇的理論進展與貢獻。重點在於使學生可以實際運用分析性的視野與概念,探究從建築到都市,地方到全球的各種實際空間議題。對於藝術學院的學生來說,「空間」的概念是處理特殊場所(site-specific)展覽與公共藝術的關鍵,透過理論掌握與分析工具,方能掌握空間的特性,使得藝術不僅是裝飾品,也非是街道家俱中最不實用的一種美化行為。

二、教材內容:文獻與影像

三、實施方法:

題講座與課堂報告、案例分析

四、評量方式:

平時課堂參與25%,課堂報告50%,期末報告25%。修課同學每週於課堂報告必讀讀本,期末則繳交(12000字)學術報告。

五、主要讀本及參考書目:

 詳見課程進度

六、教學進度:

                           

 閱讀資料

  報告同學與報告文件

1

導論與課程介紹

參閱詳細課程安排與閱讀資料

 

 

2

公共空間與公共性(一)

 

 

蔡佳芸 

 

3

公共空間與公共性(二)

 

 

左涵潔   林芸竹 林佩穎  蔡佳芸

 

4

空間的生產:Henri Lefebvre的空間論(一)

 

 

 

5

空間的生產:Henri Lefebvre的空間論(二)

 

 

8-14節 節譯 8-14節 蔡佳芸19-21譯

布爾喬亞

 

6

批判的歷史地理學:David Harvey(一)

 

 

時空之間 空間6th

巴黎 現代性之都 

7

批判的歷史地理學:David Harvey(一)

 

 

新帝國主義1.2章 思文

新自由主義2.3章 佩穎

 

8

集體消費到網絡社會:Manuel Castells(一)

 

 

 

 

蔡佳芸  空間8th 涵潔-期中

佩穎期中1

佩穎期中2 

9

集體消費到網絡社會:Manuel Castells(二)

 

 

林佩穎 蔡佳芸 

千禧年之終結4-結論

 

10

集體消費到網絡社會:Manuel Castells(三)

 

 

千禧年之終結(左) 

 

11

空間符號學

 

 

寫作的零度  城市與符號 

12

空間的再現

 

 

看不見的城市(佩穎) 

重繪台北新圖象

 

13

空間與消費

 

 

觀光客的凝視(佩穎) 

 

14

權力與空間:Michel Foucault

 

 

權力之眼(佳芸) 

 

15

後現代空間(一)

 

 

 

 

16

後現代空間(二)

 

 

 

 

17

空間政治學

 

 

 

 

18

期末報告(二)

 

 

林佩穎 

 

 

 

 

 

七、課程安排與詳細閱讀資料

 

 

第一周 課程說明

上課前,請先閱讀:

  1.  Susser, Ida (2002) “Manuel Castells: Conceptualizing the City in the Information Age”, in Ida Susser ed. Cities and Social Theory, Oxford: Blackwell, pp.1-12.(中譯收於羅崗編《帝國、都市與現代性》,〈二十一世紀的社會學〉,江蘇人民出版社。頁239-257)二十一世紀的都市社會學.pdf
  2. Massey, Doreen(1992) " Politics and Space/TIme" New Left Review, NO.196, Nov-Dev. pp.65-84. (reprinted in Doreen Massey(1994) Space, Place and Gender, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp.249-272.

 

第二周 公共空間與公共性(一)

必讀】

1.       Habermas, Jurgen (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge: Polity Press. (曹衛東等譯,《公共領域的結構轉型》,台北:聯經,2002。)(另可參考汪暉、陳燕谷主編,《文化與公共性》,北京:三聯,1998。)

2.       Arendt, Hennah (1958) The Human Condition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(劉峰譯文)(另可參考:蔡英文(2002),《政治實踐與公共空間漢娜鄂蘭的政治思想》,台北:聯經,第四章。)

【參考】

  1. Calhoun, Craig (1993) Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT PressEthington, Philip J. (1994) The Public City: The Political Construction of Urban Life in San Francisco, 1850-1900, Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres
  2. Pratt, Geraldine (2000) “Private and Public Sphere”, in R.J. Johnston et al. eds. The Dictionary of Human Geography, Fourth Edition, Oxford: Blackwell, pp.636-637
  3. Robbins, Bruce (1993) The Phantom Public Sphere, Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press. (introduction)
  4. Forester, John (1985) Critical Theory and Public Life, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press
  5. Castells, Manuel (1997) The Power of Identity, Oxford: Blackwell
  6. Robbins, Bruce eds. (1993) The Phantom Public Shpere, Mineapolis, Minn:University of Minnesota Press.
  7. Frazer, Nancy (1990) "Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy" , Soical Text. No.25/26, pp.56-80.
  8. Calhoun, Craig(1993)  Hebermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press
  9. Weisman Leslie Kanes (1992) " The Private Use of Public Space" in Descrimination by Design: A Feminist Critique of the Man-Made Enviroment, Urbana, III:University of Illnois Press, pp67-85. (有中譯本《設計的歧視》
  10. Hansen, Philip (1993) Hannah Arendt: Politics, History and Citizenship. Cambridge:Polity.(ch2)
  11. 夏鑄九(2004)《爭論公共性:公共空間中的公共藝術》,台北:台北市政府文化局。
  12. 夏鑄九(2005),〈重新界定公共性——全球化台北的都市再發展策略之文化表現〉第二屆海峽兩岸新經濟地理學學術會議,台灣大學地理環境資源學系主辦,620-22日。
  13. 夏鑄九,200212,〈全球都會區域、華人城市的文化與公共藝術〉,兩岸四地公共藝術研討會,《城市建設與公共藝術》,台大建築與城鄉研究基金會主辦,台北,20021224-25日。
  14. 《亞太城市的公共空間》2007,中國建築工業出版

 

第三周 公共空間與公共性(二)

【必讀】

 

  1. Richard Sennett (1974) , The Fall of Public Man. New York: Norton (中譯本,萬毓澤譯(2007),《再會吧!公共人》,台北:群學)

【參考】

 

  1. 黃煜文譯,《肉體與石頭》,台北:麥田,2003(Sennett, Richard (1994), Flesh and Stone. )
  2. Weintraub, Jeff (1995) “Varieties and Vicissitudes of Public Space”, in Philip Kasinitz eds. Metropolis: Center and Symbol of Our Times, Washington Square, New York: New York University Press, pp.280-319
  3. Weintraub, Jeff and Krishan Kumar eds. (1997) Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  4. Benjamin, Walter (1955/1978) “Paris, Capital of the Nineteenth Century”, in Peter Demetz eds. (1978) Reflections, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, pp.146-162.
  5. Frisby, David (2001) Cityscapes of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity. (ch.1, “The City Observed: The Flaneur in Social Theory”, pp.27-51.)
  6. Hooper, Barbara (1998) “The Poem of Male Desires: Female Bodies, Modernity, and ‘Paris, Capital of the 19th Century’”, in Leonie Sandercock eds. Making the Invisible Visible: A Multicultural Planning History, Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, pp.227-254.
  7. Sennett, Richard (1988) “The Civitas of Seeing”, Place, Vol.5, No.4, pp.82-84.
  8. Sennett, Richard(1990), The Conscience of The Eye. New York: Norton
  9. Sennett, Richard (1994) “The Power of the Eye”, in Russell Ferguson eds. (1994)Urban Revisions: Current Projects for the Public Realm, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, pp.59-69.
  10. Glazer, Nathan and Mark Lilla eds. (1987) The Public Face of Architecture: Civic Culture and Public Spaces, New York: The Free Press.
  11. Savage, Mike (1995) “Walter Benjamin's Urban Thought: A Critical Analysis”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol.13, pp.201-216.
  12. Amin, Ash (1994) "Post-Fordism :Models, Fantasies and Phantoms of Transition" in Ash Amin eds. Post-Fordism: A Reader, Oxford:Blackwell, pp.1-39. 
  13. Bolton, Richard (1989) "Figments of the Public: Architectures and teh Debt", Marco Diani and Catherine Ingraham eds. Resturcturing Architectural Theory, Evanston, III:Northwestern University Press, pp.42-47.
  14. Tom Jones, by Henry Fielding http://www.literaturepage.com/read/tom-jones.html From 左

  15. Persian Letter, by Montesquieu http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Persian_Letters From 左

  16. Eugene Delacoxi, <Liberty Guiding the People>. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Eugène_Delacroix_-_La_liberté_guidant_le_peuple.jpg
  17. Honor'e Daumier, <The Uprising>. http://www.artchive.com/artchive/D/daumier/uprising.jpg.html 
  18. Honor'e Daumier, <Family on the Barricades> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Honoré_Daumier_011.jpg

 

 

第四周 空間的生產:Henri Lefebvre的空間論(一)

 

【必讀】

1.      Henri Lefebvre(1979) “Space: Social Product and Use Value” in J. W. Freiberg(ed.) Critical Sociology: European Perspective. New York: Irvington, pp.285-295). (有中譯本,收錄於夏鑄九、王志弘(1993)《空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本》。台北:明文。Pp.19-30)

2.      Johnsion R.J et al .eds. (1994) . “Production of Space”, The Dictionary of Huamn Geography, pp480-482)(有中譯)

 

 

第五周空間的生產:Henri Lefebvre的空間論(二)

 

【必讀】

  1. Henri Lefebvre(1984) The Production of Space. Blackwell. (1.plan of the Present Work and Afterword by David Harvey)
  2. Henri Lefebvre(1994) “The Bureaucratic of Society of Controlled Consumption”, Everyday life in the Modern Word. Transaction Publishers.

 

【參考】

 

  1. Henri Lefebvre(1996) , Writings on Cities. Blackwell.
  2. Henri Lefebvre(1996) , Critique of Everyday Life (3-volume Set). Verso; Special Ed edition.
  3. Soja, Edward (1995) "Heterotopologies: A Rememberance of Other Spaces in the Citadel-LA. in Sophie Watson and Katherine Gibson eds. Postmodern Cities nad Spaces, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp.13-34.
  4. Ben Highmore(2008) 〈亨利‧列斐伏爾的日常生活辯證法〉,《日常生活與文化理論導論》,pp.187-239.北京:商務印書館
  5. 「文學書寫與空間生產」經典研讀網站 http://cc.shu.edu.tw/~ericsu/index.htm
  6. 吳怡萱 (2007),<空間游擊戰: 跨國、在地與流動攤販> ,文化研究月報65期.

 

 

第六周 批判的歷史地理學:David Harvey(一)

【必讀】

 

  1. David Harey(1990).”Between Space and Time: Reflection on the Geographical Imagination” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 80(3),pp.418-434(中譯收於夏鑄九、王志弘編譯(1990).《空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本》台北:明文。Pp.47-97)
  2. Daivd Harvey (2006) 《巴黎,現代性之都》,黃煜文譯,臺北:群學
  3. 大衛哈維(2003)〈地租的藝術:全球化、壟斷與全球的商品化〉,城市設計學報,NO.15/16, pp.1-19.(王志弘譯) 壟斷地租.pdf

 

第七周 批判的歷史地理學:David Harvey(二)

 

 

【必讀】

1.      Daivd Harvey (2008) 《新帝國主義》,王志弘、王玥民,徐苔玲/合譯,臺北:群學

2.      Daivd Harvey (2008) 《新自由主義化的空間》,王志弘,臺北:群學

 

【參考】

1.      1 Jane Jacobs2007),《偉大城市的誕生與衰亡:美國都市街道生活的啟發》(The Death and Life of Great American Cities,臺北:聯經

2.      林欣榮(2006)《城市空間治理的創新策略(三個台灣首都城市案例評析:台北.新竹.高雄),臺北:新自然主義

3.      Daivd Harvey (200), Space of Hope. California.

4.      黃孫權(2003),〈今日的烏托邦,明日的現實:訪David Harvey〉,破週報復刊240

5.      陳東昇(1995),《金權城市:地方派系、財團與台北都會發展的社會學分析》,台北:巨流

 

 

第八周 集體消費到網絡社會:Manuel Castells(一)

 

【必讀】

 

  1. Castells, Manuel(1983)”A Cross-Culture Theory of Urban Social Change”, in The City and the Grassroots, Cal: University of California Press. Pp.289-336(有中譯,陳梧譯,〈一個跨文化的都市社會變遷理論〉,收於夏鑄九、王志宏編譯,《空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本》,pp.223- 300 ,台北:明文書局)
  2. Castells, Manuel(1983)”Conclusion: The Reconstruction of Social Meaning in the Spcae of Flows, in The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring and the Urban-Regions Process, Oxford: Basil Blackwell(中譯收於夏鑄九、王志弘編譯(1990)〈流動空間中社會意義的重建〉,《空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本》台北:明文。Pp.367-374)

 

 

【參考】

  1. Castells, Manuel, The Urban Question, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1977, part V, "The Urban Process", pp.379-427; and Ch. 1-3, "Urbanization, Development and Dependence", pp.39-63.
  2. Feagin, Joe R., ed. The Urban Scene: Myths and Realities, second edition, New York: Random House, 1979, ch.1, "The Urban Crisis", pp.11-74.
  3. Scott, Allen, "The Meaning and Social Origins of Discourse on the Spatial Foundations of Society", in Gould, Peter, and Gunnar Olsson, ed. A Search for Common Ground, London: Pion Limitd, 1982, pp.141-156.
  4. Portes, Alejandro, and John Walton, Labor, Class, and the International System, New York: Academic Press, 1981, ch.1, "Introduction", pp.1-20; and ch.3, "Unequal Exchange and the Urban Informal Sector", pp67-106.
  5. Castells, Manuel, “Urban Sociology in the twenty-first Century”, in Susser, Ida, ed. The Castells Reader on Cities and Social Theory, Oxford: Blackwell, 2000, conclusion.
  6. Marshall, Tim, ed. Transforming Barcelona, London: Routledga, 2004
  7. Castells, Manuel, The City and the Grassroots, Berkerley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press, 1983, part 6, "A Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social Change", pp.289-336.
  8. Castells, Manuel, "Urban Sociology and Urban Politics: From a Critique to New Trends of Research", in Walton, John, and Louis H. Masotti, ed.The City in Comparative Perspective: Cross- National Research and New Direction in Theory, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1976, pp.291-300.
  9. Pickvance, C. G., "Comparative Urban Analysis and Assumptions about Causality", paper presented at the Economic and Social Research Council/Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Conference on Comparative Research on Islamic and Arab Cities, Birkbeck College, London, 1984.( in International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol.10, No.2, 1986)
  10. Douglass, Mike, "Transnational Capital and Urbanization on the Pacific Rim", International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol.12, No.3, Sept. 1988, pp.343-355.
  11. Stuckey, Barbara, "Rural Substance, Migration and Urbanization: The Production, Destruction and Reproduction of Cheap Labour in the World Market Economy", Antipode, Vol.13, No.2, 1981, pp.1-14.
  12. Misra, R.P., "The Changing Perception of Development Problems", in Misra, R.P., and M. Honjo, ed. Changing Perception of Development Problems, Hong Kong: Maruen Asia, 1981.
  13. Weinstein, John, "Economic Development and the Quality of Life: A Structural Analysis of the Modernizer's Dilemma", Studies in Comparative International Development, Vol.xvi, No.3-4, 1981, pp.108-126.
  14. Jenkins, Rhys, "Divisions over the International Division of Labour", Capital & Class, N.22, Spring 1984, pp.28- 57.
  15. Lubeck, Paul, and John Walton, "Urban Class Conflict in Africa and Latin America: Comparative Analyses from a World Systems Perspective", in International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, V.3, N.1, March 1979.
  16. Scott, Allen, ed. Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  17. Sassen, Saskia, ed. Global Networks Linked Cities, New York: Routledge, 2002.
  18. Graafland, Arie, “Introduction: Cities in Transition”, in Graafland, Arie, ed. Cities in Transition, Rotterdam:010 Publishers, 2001, pp.18-35.
  19. Kooijman, D., and Wigmans, G., “Managing the City: Flows and Places at Rotterdam Central Station”, City, Vol.7, No.3, pp.301-326.

 

 

第九周 集體消費到網絡社會:Manuel Castells(二)

 

【必讀】

 

1.      Castells, Manuel1998)《網絡社會之崛起》,夏鑄九等譯, 台北:唐山出版社

 

 

第十周 集體消費到網絡社會:Manuel Castells(三)

 

【必讀】

 

1.      Castells, Manuel2001)《千禧年之終結》,夏鑄九等譯, 台北:唐山出版社

 

【參考】

1.      AnnaLee Saxenian (1999)《區域優勢》,台北:天下

2.      Zugmunt Bauman (2001),《全球化對人類的深遠影響》,張君玫譯,台北:群學

3.      Castells, Manuel2007)《網絡星河》,鄭波等等譯, 北京:社會科學文獻出版社

4.      Castells, Manuel1997The Power of Identity. Blackwell.

5.      陳冠甫(1991)〈台灣高科技工業的依賴發展與空間結構〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,第三卷第一期。Pp.113-149.

 

 

第十一周 空間符號學

 

 

【必讀】

  1. Barthes, Roland. (1979). The Eiffel Tower and Other Mythologies. New York: The Noonday Press.(李幼蒸譯,(1991),〈艾菲爾鐵塔〉,收於李幼蒸編譯《寫作的零度:結構主義文學理論文選》(頁156-168),台北︰時報。)
  2. Barthes, Roland(1986) ”Semiology and the Urban” in M. Gottdiener & Alexandors Ph. Logopoulos (eds.) The City and the Sign: An Introduction to Urban Semiotics. New York: Columbia Univeristy Press. Pp.87-98 (中譯本〈符號學與都市〉收於夏鑄九、王志宏編譯,《空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本》,pp.527- 538 ,台北:明文書局)
  3. Gottdiener, M. and Alexandros ph. Lagopoulos. (1986). “Introduction”, in M. Gottdiener and Alexandros ph. Lagopoulos (eds), The City and the Sign: An Introduction to Urban Semiotics (pp. 1-22). New York: Columbia University Press.(吳瓊芬等譯,〈城市與符號(導言)〉,收於夏鑄九、王志弘編譯《空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本》(頁505-526),台北︰明文書局。)

 

【參考】

  1. Zukin, Sharon (1995) The Cultures of Cities, Oxford: Blackwell.
  2. Barthes, Roland. (1970/1982). Empire of Signs. New York: Hill and Wang.(孫乃修譯,(1993),《符號禪意東洋風》,台北:台灣商務。)
  3. Sennett, Richard (1988) “The Civitas of Seeing”, Place, Vol.5, No.4, pp.82-84.
  4. Barthes, Roland1952The Blue Guide, in Mythologies, Noonday, pp.74-77
  5. Savage, Mike (1995) “Walter Benjamin's Urban Thought: A Critical Analysis”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol.13, pp.201-216.
  6. Brennan, Thomas (1988) Public Drinking and Popular Culture in Eighteenth-Century Paris, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

 

第十二周 空間的再現

 

 

【必讀】

1.      Sennett, Richard (1994) “The Power of the Eye”, in Russell Ferguson eds. (1994)Urban Revisions: Current Projects for the Public Realm, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, pp.59-69.(有中譯)

2.      Fredric Jameson (1998) “Cognitive Mapping” in Cary Nelson & Lawrence Grossberg(eds) Marxism an the Interpretation Culture. Chicago: University of Illinois Press. Pp.347-357.(有中譯)

3.      Fredric Jameson (1984)”Postomdernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism”, New Left Revew, No.146 July-Aug., pp.359-374)(有中譯)

4.      Fredric Jameson(1994) "Remapping Taipei" in  Nick Browne et.el (Eds) New Chinese Cinema: Forms, Identities, Politics New York: Cambridge UP. Pp.117-150.(有中譯)remapping_taipai2.pdf

 

【參考】

 

  1. Sennett, Richard(1990), The Conscience of The Eye. New York: Norton
  2. Zukin, Sharon (1989). Loft Living: Culture and Capital in Urban Change. Routledge
  3. Zukin, Sharon. (1996). The Culture of Cities. Wiley-Blackwell
  4. 邱詠婷 (2005). 《全球化下的台北都市辯證消費奇觀的建構與另類出路之空間生產》國立台灣大學 建築與城鄉研究所博士論文
  5. 董啟章(1997)《地圖集一個想像的城市的考古學》,台北:聯合文學
  6. Roland Tolention (1995) "Geopolitical Space and the Chinese 'City Film": A Prolegomenon to Transnational and Cinematic Space" in 「海峽兩岸暨香港電影發展與文化變遷研討會」
  7. 伊塔羅˙卡爾維諾(1993)《看不見的城市》,台北:時報

 

 

第十三周 空間的消費

 

【必讀】

1.      John Urry 2007,《觀光客的凝視》,臺北:書林

2.      Klaus Westerhausen (2002), Beyond the Beach: An Ethnography fo Modern Travelers in Asia. White Lotus.

【參考】

1.      Zukin, Sharon (2005). Point of Purchase: How Shopping changed American Culture. Routledge

2.      John Hannigan (1998). Fantasy City. London: Routledge.

3.      John Urry (1995) Consuming Places. London:Rouledge.

 

 

第十四周 權力與空間:Michel Foucault

 

【必讀】

1.      Michael Foucault (1980) ” The eye of Power” in his Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writing 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books. Pp.146-165) (中譯收於王志弘譯(1992)《當代》74:97-115)

2.      Michael Foucault (1986) ”Of Other Spaces” Diacritics, 16(1)(spring):22-27) (中譯收於王志弘譯(1992)《當代》74:97-115) (中譯收於夏鑄九、王志弘編譯《空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本》(頁399-409),台北︰明文書局)

 

【參考】

 

1.      傅科(1992)《規訓與懲罰-監獄的誕生》,台北:桂冠。

2.      Gwendolyn Wright & Paul Rabinow (1982) ”Spatialization of Power: A Discussion of the work of Michel Foucault” Skyline, March, pp.14-45) (中譯收於王志弘譯(1992)《當代》74:97-115) (中譯收於夏鑄九、王志弘編譯《空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本》(頁375-384),台北︰明文書局)

 

第十五周 後現代空間(一)

【必讀】

 

  1. 大衛哈維 (2005) 〈社會正義、後現代主義和城市〉,收錄於羅崗編《帝國、都市與現代性》,江蘇人民出版社。頁199-215
  2. Neil Smith (1992) “New City, New Frontier: The Lower East Site as Wild, Wild West” in Michael Sorkin ed. Variations on A Theme Park. Hoonday. Pp.61-93.

 

【參考】

  1. David Harvey (1991) The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Part 1 pp. 3-120.
  2. David Harvey (1996) Justice, Nature & the Geography of Difference. Blackwelll.
  3. 後現代的都市主義.pdf

 

 

 

第十六周 後現代空間(二)

【必讀】

 

1. 索雅(Edward W. Soja)《第三空間》,王志弘等譯。台北:桂冠

 

【參考】

  1. 索雅 (2005) 〈後現代地理學和歷史主義的批判〉,收錄於羅崗編《帝國、都市與現代性》,江蘇人民出版社。頁216-238
  2. 索雅(2006)《后大都市─ 城市與區域的批判性研究》,上海:上海教育出版社

 

 

第十七周 空間政治學

【必讀】

 

 

1.      Castells, Manuel1997”The Other Face of the Earth: Social Movements against the New Global Order” The Power of Identity. Blackwell.pp.68-109.

 

 

【參考】

1.      David Sibley(1995) Geographies of Exclusion. Routledge.

 

 

第十八周 期末報告

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.